Home | Electronic periodical | Сategories | CONCEPTUAL ISSUES OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLINGUISTICS | COMPLEMENTARY MODELS OF SPEECH COMMUNICATION

COMPLEMENTARY MODELS OF SPEECH COMMUNICATION

E.F. Tarasov

COMPLEMENTARY MODELS OF SPEECH COMMUNICATION
(STATING THE PROBLEM)

 

The article dwells upon the reasons of speech messages understanding variability in joint activities (JA). The identical understanding of speech messages is ensured by the communicants’ common consciousness based on the appropriation of the same ethnic culture, and the variability of understanding is determined by a) the uniqueness of each individual consciousness within one’s ethnos and b) the difference in motives, goals, operations, assessments of conditions among JA participants and observers.

The analysis of the reasons of speech messages understanding variability of in the JA is possible only within the triangulation approach, which involves various scientific data, different researchers, different theories and different methods.

Keywords: complimentary models, prerequisites for symbolic communication, identical communicants’ consciousness, uniqueness of an individual’s consciousness, JA structure, triangulation approach.

 

References

  1. Abercrombie N., Hill S., Turner E.S. (2004) Sotsiologicheskiy slovar’. M.: «Ekonomika» [Sociological Dictionary. M.: “Economics”]. 2004. [In Russian]
  2. Abul’khanova K.A. (1973) O sub”yekte psikhicheskoy deyatel’nosti. [About the subject of mental activity]. Moscow: Nauka, 1973.288p. [In Russian]
  3. Bakhtin M.M. (1963) Sobraniye sochineniy. T.6. «Problemy poetiki Dostoyevskogo», 1963. Raboty 1960-kh – 1970-kh gg. [Collected Works. V.6. “Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics”, 1963. Works of the 1960s – 1970s.] M.: Izd-vo «Russkiye slovari»; Izd-vo «YAzyki slavyanskoy kul’tury» [M.: Publishing house “Russian dictionaries”; Publishing house “Languages of Slavic culture”]. 2002. 799p. [In Russian]
  4. Lomov B.F. (1984) Metodologicheskiye i teoreticheskiye problemy psikhologii. [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. M.: Iz-vo «Nauka», 1984. 444p. [In Russian]
  5. Matveyev M.O., Nistratov A.A., Tarasov Ye.F. (2019) Vospriyatiye teksta v zavisimosti ot kommunikativnoy pozitsii ispytuyemogo [Perception of the text depending on the communicative position of the subject] // Per linguam ad communicationem. Klyuchevyye voprosy lingvisticheskoy teorii v rezhime diskussii. Kollektivnaya monografiya, pod red. A.V. Vdovichenko, Ye.F. Tarasova, I.V. Zhuravleva. M.: Institut yazykoznaniya, [Per linguam ad communicationem. Key questions of linguistic theory in the discussion mode. Collective monograph, ed. A.V. Vdovichenko, E.F. Tarasov, I. V. Zhuravlev. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics]. 2019.436 p. [In Russian]
  6. Porus V.N. (2009) Intersub”yektivnost’ [Intersubjectivity] // Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya». [Encyclopedia of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. M.: “Canon +” ROOI “Rehabilitation”] 2009. P.300–301. [In Russian]
  7. Sokovnin V.M. (1974) O prirode chelovecheskogo obshcheniya. [On the nature of human communication] Frunze, 1974. [In Russian]
  8. Yakubinskiy L.P. (1923) O dialogicheskoy rechi. [About dialogical speech]. M., 1923. [In Russian]
  9. Yanchuk V.A. (2000). Metodologiya, teoriya i metod sotsial’noy psikhologii i personologii: integrativno-eklekticheskiy podkhod. Mn.: Bestprint. [Methodology, theory and method of social psychology and personology: an integrative-eclectic approach]. Minsk: Bestprint, 2000. 416 p. [In Russian]
  10. 10. Denzin N.K. The Research Act. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NY, Prentice Hall, 1989.
Extract from the register of registered media dated May 23, 2019, El N FS77-75769, issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor)