PSYCHOLINGUISTIC METHOD OF STUDYING UNIVERSAL VALUES

E. Zhamaletdinova

PSYCHOLINGUISTIC METHOD OF STUDYING UNIVERSAL VALUES

The article offers a complex approach to the solution of the psycholinguistic problem which constitutes in research of universal values’ transformation. That is represented as the research of the value “duty” as it is perceived in Russian culture. Theoretically it is founded on the activity approach elaborated by A.N. Leontiev and the triangulation approach of social psychology. The later combines qualitative and quantitative methods which contributes into a higher level of validity and extended knowledge. The article describes the procedure of analyzing the basic value ‘duty’ with the help of the battery of such methods as the associative experiment, psychosemantic experiment and definitive analysis

Keywords: value; triangulation; psycholinguistics; associative experiment; psychosemantic experiment; culture.

 

References:

  1. Grigor’ev A.A., Lapteva E.M., Grigor’ev N.A., Karlin A.V. Dannye vsemirnogo issledovanija vzaimosvjazi cennostej, nacional’nyh IQ i social’no-jekonomicheskih dostizhenij stran // Organizacionnaja psiholingvistika. M. OOO «Agentstvo social’no-gumanitarnyh tehnologij», 2019. № 2(6). Ss. 62-88.
  2. Zhamaletdinova Je.H. Pokolencheskie razlichija vosprijatija cennosti «Dolg» // Voprosy psiholingvistiki. 2017. №2 (32). Ss. 190-198.
  3. Ivan’ko L.I. Cennostno-normativnye mehanizmy reguljacii // Kul’turnaja dejatel’nost’: opyt sociologicheskogo issledovanija. M.: Nauka, 1981. Ss. 149-187.
  4. Lapin N.I. Universal’nye cennosti i mnogoobrazie zhiznennyh mirov ljudej // Mezhdunarodnye Lihachevskie nauchnye chtenija, 2010 / Jel. resurs URL: http://www.lihachev.ru/chten/6514/
  5. Leont’ev D.A. Cennost’ kak mezhdisplinarnoe ponjatie: opyt mnogomernoj rekonstrukcii // Voprosy filosofii. 1996. № 4.  Ss. 15-26.
  6. Nacional’nyj korpus russkogo jazyka // Jel.resurs. URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru/
  7. Parsons T. O social’nyh sistemah. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 2002. 832 s.
  8. Semjonova V.V. Strategija kombinacii kachestvennogo i kolichestvennogo podhodov pri izuchenii pokolenij // Inter. № 8, 2014. S. 5-15.
  9. Tarasov E.F. Problema analiza soderzhanija obshhechelovecheskih cennostej// Voprosy psiholingvistiki, № 1(15), 2012. S. 8-17
  1. Cherkasova G.A., Ufimceva N.V. Russkij regional’nyj associativnyj slovar’-tezaurus EVRAS // Jel.resurs. http://iling-ran.ru/main/publications/evras
  2. Janchuk V.A. Integrativno-jeklekticheskij podhod k analizu psihologicheskoj fenomenologii. Slovar’-spravochnik. Akademija postdiplomnogo obrazovanija, Minsk, 2001. 196 s.
  3. Denzin N. The research act: a theoretical introduction into sociological methods. NY: McGraw-Hill, 1970. //Jel.resurs. https://books.google.ru/books?id=WxwuDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT187&lpg=PT187&dq=206.%09Denzin+N.++The+research+act:+a+theoretical+introduction+into+sociological+me
  4. Kluckhohn S. Values and Value Orientations in the Theory of Action // Towars a General Theory of Action / Ed. by T.Parsons, E.Shils/ Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1951, Pp. 388-433.
  5. Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values. N.Y.: The Free Press, 1973. 438 p.

15. Rossman, G.B., Wilson, B.L. Numbers and words: Combing quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review 9, 1985, Pp. 627-643

Extract from the register of registered media dated May 23, 2019, El N FS77-75769, issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor)