Home | Electronic periodical | Сategories | FROM THE HISTORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLINGUISTICS | ON THE VIEWS OF I. KANT AND M. F. QUINTILIAN ON THE ETHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ORATORY

ON THE VIEWS OF I. KANT AND M. F. QUINTILIAN ON THE ETHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ORATORY

Lobanova L. P.

ON THE VIEWS OF I. KANT AND M. F. QUINTILIAN ON THE ETHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ORATORY

The article presents an analysis of the influence of the concepts of I. Kant and M. F. Quintilian on the formation of the ethical foundations of oratory, as well as the question of the role of speech actions and opinions in historical processes.
A comparative analysis of the views of I. Kant and M. F. Quintilian on the ethical principles of oratory and rhetoric allows us to better understand their development from antiquity to modern times, as well as to confirm the status of speech actions and the role of opinions in historical processes, which was fixed by the French revolution.
Public life is governed by speech actions, which must be properly organized in the interests of successful development. All the rhetorical schools of antiquity, in particular, served the purpose of creating such a correct organization of speech actions, although the understanding of rhetoric as a subject differed depending on the rhetorical concept.
The lost theoretical work of Quintilian” On the causes of the decline of eloquence ” (De causis corruptae eloquentiae) was presumably devoted to the consideration of the relationship between the loss of rhetoric of its meaning and the General decline of morals, public morals and the corruption of language, which was most evident in schools.

Keywords: Kant, Quintilian, rhetoric, ethical foundations, speech actions

 

References

  1. Burkkhardt YA. Razmyshleniya o vsemirnoj istorii [Reflections on world history] M.: Rosspen, 2004.
  2. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya [Criticism of judgment] 1790 // I. Kant. Soch. v 6 tomah. T. 5. M.: Mysl’, 1966. S. 161-529.
  3. Kvintilian M. F. Dvenadcat’ knig ritoricheskih nastavlenij [Twelve books of rhetorical instructions] / Per. s lat. [nepolnyj] A. Nikol’skogo. CH. 1-2. SPb: tipografiya Imperatorskoj Rossijskoj Akademii, 1834.
  4. Lobanova L.P. Koncepciya yazykovoj kartiny mira i ee istoki v trudah Vil’gel’ma fon Gumbol’dta. [The concept of the language picture of the world and its origins in the works of Wilhelm von Humboldt]. M.: Lenand/URSS, 2015.
  5. Shost’in A.P. Kvintilian – ego vliyanie na shkolu i cerkovnoe krasnorechie // Pravoslavnaya bogoslovskaya enciklopediya. [Quintilian – its impact on the school and Church oratory // the Orthodox theological encyclopedia]. Tom” IX. Sostavlen pod redakcieyu N.N. Glubokovskago. Izdanie preemnikov” pokojnogo professora A.P. Lopuhina. S.-Peterburg”: Slovo, 1908.  S. 332-340
  6. Adamik T. Quintilians Ethik // Graeco-Latina Brunensia, Band 14, H. 1-2 (2009). P. 11-18.
  7. Ax W. Quintilian für Lehrer. Bemerkungen zu Buch 1 und 2 der Institutio oratoria // Pegasus-Onlinezeitschrift X/1 (2010). S. 1-18.
  8. Brinton A. Quintilian, Plato, and the vir bonus // Philosophy & Rhetoric, Vol. 16, Nr. 3 (1983). P. 167–184.
  9. Clarke M.L. Quintilian on education // T.A. Dorey. Empire and Aftermath. Silver Latin II. Ed. by Thomas Alan Dorey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975. – P. 98-118.
  10. Giebel M. Quintilian: Über Pädagogik und Rhetorik. München: Goldman Verlag, 1974.
  11. Hamann J.G. Metakritik über den Purismus der reinen Vernunft // Hamanns Schriften. Hrsg. von Friedrich Roth. Siebenter Theil. Berlin: G. Reimer, 1825. S. 3-16.
  12. Herder J.G. (а). Verstand und Erfahrung. Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Erster Theil. Leipzig: Bei Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, 1799.
  13. Herder I. G. (b).Vernunft und Sprache. Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Zweyter Theil. Frankfurt und Leipzig, 1799.
  14. Hompanera I. G. Der vir bonus peritus dicendi. Quintilian und das Problem einer richtigen Definition der Rhetorik // Divinatio. Studia culturologica series, vol. 47 (2019). Sofia, 2019.  P. 37-59.
  15. Kalverkämper H. Quintilian: Redner und Lehrer // Handbuch: Antike Rhetorik. Hrsg. von Michael Erler und Christian Tornau. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2019. S. 435-469
  16. Law V. Quintilian and the ideal education // Law V. The History of Linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. P. 60-65.
  17. Radermacher L. Eine Schrift über den Redner als Quelle Ciceros und Quintilians // Rheinisches Museum für Philologie Neue Folge, 54. Bd. (1899). S. 285-292.             18. Ueding G. Klassische Rhetorik. – München: C.H. Beck, 2005.
  18. Wildberger J. Seneca und die Stoa: Der Platz des Menschen in der Welt [Band 1: Text. Band 2: Anhänge, Literatur, Anmerkungen und Register]. – Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2006.

20. Winterbottom M. Quintilian and the vir bonus // The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 54/1-2 (1964). – P. 90-97

Extract from the register of registered media dated May 23, 2019, El N FS77-75769, issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor)