SEMANTIC FLUENCY TASK WITH DIFFERENT SEMANTIC CATEGORIES: FACTORS OF FULFILMENT AND THE PROBLEM OF GENERALITY OF THE SEARCH MODEL

A. Grigorjev, E. Lapteva

SEMANTIC FLUENCY TASK WITH DIFFERENT SEMANTIC CATEGORIES: FACTORS OF FULFILMENT AND THE PROBLEM OF GENERALITY OF THE SEARCH MODEL

 

In the article, the results of the study of the role of the psycholinguistic variables (age of word acquisition, word frequency, word imageability and object familiarity) as factors of fulfillment of semantic fluency task, in which objects belonging to a semantic category are generated during certain time, and of estimating of generality of the model of information search when this task is fulfilled, which was tested by other researchers on few categories, are presented. These results are as follows. (1) It has been shown, that more early acquired, more frequent, imageable and familiar category members are generated more often in semantic fluency task. (2) We failed to reveal contribution of psycholinguistic variables over and above the degree of category clustering into the prediction of category potency (an average number of category members generated in fulfillment of category fluency task). This result can be explained by small sample of categories, which is due to the fact that only for few categories the necessary data were available, and by strong correlation of potency and the degree of category clustering. (3) By means of analysis of individual data about numbers of generated members for each category, an evidence for generality of the model of information search when semantic fluency task is fulfilled, which has was tested on few semantic categories, has been obtained.

Keywords: semantic fluency, psycholinguistic variables, semantic categories, category norms, information search.

 

References

  1. Alfimova M.V. Semanticheskaya verbal’naya beglost’: normativnye dannye i osobennosti vypolneniya zadaniya bol’nymi shizofreniej [Semantic verbal fluency: normative data and task performance in a schizophrenic sample]// Social’naya i klinicheskaya psihiatriya. [Social and clinical psychiatry]. 2010. T. 20. № 3. S. 20-25.
  2. Grigor’ev, A.A. Reprezentaciya leksicheskih kategorij v soznanii nositelya yazyka. [The representation of lexical categories in the consciousness of native speaker]. M.: In-t yazykoznaniya RAN, 2004. 179 s.
  3. Drozdova K.A., Rupchev G.E., Semenova N.D. Narushenie verbal’noj beglosti u bol’nyh shizofreniej [Verbal fluency deficit in schizophrenia] // Social’naya i klinicheskaya psihiatriya. [Social and clinical psychiatry]. 2015. T. 25. № 4. S. 9-19.
  4. Myskin S.V. Ot redaktora [Editorial] // Organizacionnaya psiholingvistika. [Organizational psycholinguistics]. 2018. № 1 (1). S. 8-10.
  5. Tarasov E.F. K postroeniyu teorii organizacionnoj psiholingvistiki [To the construction of a theory of organizational psycholinguistics] // Organizacionnaya psiholingvistika. [Organizational psycholinguistics]. 2018. № 1 (1). S. 11-20.
  6. Ushakov D.V. Psihologiya intellekta i odarennosti. [Psychology of intelligence and giftedness]. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN», 2011. 463 s.
  7. Battig W.F., Montague W.E.Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut norms //Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1969. V. 80.P. 1-46.
  8. Grigoriev A., Oshhepkov I.Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 286 words in Russian: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables //Behavior Research Methods. 2013.V. 45. № 4. P. 1208-1217.
  9. Gruenwald P.J., Lockhead G.R.The free recall of category examples // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980. V. 6. № 3. P. 225-240.
  10. Kavé G., Shalmon M., Knafo A. Environmental contribution to preschoolers’ semantic fluency // Developmental Science. 2013. V. 16. № 1. P. 124-135.
  11. 11. Ryu S.-H., Kim R.W., Kim S., Park J.H., Kim T.H., Jeong H.-G., Kim J.L., Moon S.W., Bae J.N., Yoon J.C., Choo I.Y., Lee D.W., Chang S.M., Jhoo J.H., Kim S.-K., Cho M.J. Normative study of the category fluency test (CFT) from nationwide data on community-dwelling elderly in Korea // Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2012. V. 54. P. 305-309.
  12. Sherman A.M., Massman P.J. Prevalence and correlates of category versus letter fluency discrepancies in Alzheimer’s disease // Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 1999. V. 14. № 5. P. 411-418.
  13. Sumiyoshi C., Ertugrul A., Yagcioglu A.E.A., Sumiyoshi T.Semantic memory deficits based on category fluency performance in schizophrenia: Similar impairment patterns of semantic organization across Turkish and Japanese patients // Psychiatry Research. 2009. V. 167. P. 47-57.
  14. Sumiyoshi C., Matsui M., Sumiyoshi T., Yamashita I., Sumiyoshi S., Kurachi M. Semantic structure in schizophrenia as assessed by the category fluency test: Effect of verbal intelligence and age of onset // Psychiatry Research. 2001. V. 105. P. 187-199.
  15. Tombaugh T.N., Kozak J., Rees L. Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming // Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 1999. V. 14. № 2. P. 167-177.
  16. Turner J.E., Valentine T., Ellis A.W. Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision // Memory & Cognition. 1998. V. 26. № 6. P. 1282-1291.
  17. Van Overschelde J.P., Rawson K.A., Dunlosky J. Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms //Journal of Memory and Language. 2004. V. 50. P. 289-335.
Extract from the register of registered media dated May 23, 2019, El N FS77-75769, issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor)