Home | Electronic periodical | Сategories | EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN SMALL PROFESSIONAL GROUPS, LABOR COLLECTIVES, ORGANIZATIONS | SEMIOTICS OF PRODUCTIVE CONFLICT IN EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION

SEMIOTICS OF PRODUCTIVE CONFLICT IN EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION

Lukin V.A.

SEMIOTICS OF PRODUCTIVE CONFLICT IN EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION

The article analyzes the semiotic aspects of the problem task in connection with the peculiarities of educational communication and scientific communication. The author’s goal is to consider educational communication as a conflict between conflicts − productive conflict vs. destructive conflict. The learning task is regarded as the main means for maintaining a positive conflict and blocking a destructive conflict. The paper contains examples of problem tasks (with and without solutions) that the author use when reading the course “Semiotics of the text”. It offers analysis and description of semantics, syntactics and pragmatics of the learning task as text. Based on the role of problems and productive conflicts in science and education, the author argues the erroneous ness conventional wisdom about the text as any sign or any natural linguage message.

Keywords: educational communication, scientific communication, productive conflict, destructive conflict, learning task, semiotic analysis.

 

References

  1. Ball G.A. Teoriya uchebny`kh zadach: Psikhologo-pedagogicheskij aspekt. M.: Pedagogi-ka, 1990.
  2. Brazgovskaya E.E. Yazy`ki i kody`. Vvedenie v semiotiku kul`tury`: Uchebnoe posobie. − Perm`: Perm. gos. ped. un-t., 2008. − URL: https://ru.b-ok.xyz/book/2999047/e36ce8.
  3. Dunker K. Psikhologiya produktivnogo (tvorcheskogo) my`shleniya // Psikhologiya my`shleniya. Sb. perevodov s nemeczkogo i anglijskogo. M.: Progress, 1965. S. 86–234
  4. D`yudeni G. E`. Kenterberijskie golovolomki. M.: Mir, 1979.
  5. Kandinskij V. Tochka i liniya na ploskosti. SPb.: Azbuka, 2003.
  6. Kaneman D., Slovik P., Tverski A. Prinyatie reshenij v neopredelennosti: Pravila i predubezhdeniya. Khar`kov: Izd-vo Institut prikladnoj psikhologii «Gumanitarny`j czentr», 2005.
  7. Kapicza P. L. E`ksperiment. Teoriya. Praktika. Stat`i i vy`stupleniya. M.: Nauka, 1987.
  8. Kozer L. Funkczii soczial`nogo konflikta. M.: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual`noj knigi, 2000.
  9. Kollinz R. Global`naya teoriya intellektual`nogo izmeneniya. Novosibirsk: Sibirskij khronograf, 2002.
  10. Lakatos I. Dokazatel`stva i oproverzheniya. M.: Nauka, 1967.
  11. Lotman Yu.M. Istoricheskie zakonomernosti i struktura teksta // Lotman Yu.M. Vnutri my`slyashhikh mirov. Chelovek − tekst − semiosfera − istoriya. M.: Yazy`ki russkoj kul`tury`, 1996. − S. 307−343.
  12. Lukin V.A. 100 zadach po semiotike teksta. Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Flinta, 2019.
  13. Lukin V.A. Progressivnaya intolerantnost` v kommunikativno-filosofskom izmerenii // Politicheskaya konczeptologiya: zhurnal metadiscziplinarny`kh issledovanij. 2017. # 2. S. 74–89.
  1. Mechkovskaya N.B. Semiotika: Yazy`k. Priroda. Kul`tura: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Iz-datel`skij czentr «Akademiya», 2004.
  2. Nikolaeva T.M. Tekst // Lingvisticheskij e`ncziklopedicheskij slovar`. M.: Sovetskaya e`ncziklopediya, 1999. − S. 507.
  3. Pirs Ch. S. Grammatica Speculativa // Pirs Ch. S. Logicheskie osnovaniya teorii zna-kov. SPb.: Laboratoriya metafizicheskikh issledovanij filosofskogo fakul`teta SPbGU; Aletejya, 2000. S. 40–223.
  4. Podd`yakov A.N. Issledovatel`skoe povedenie: strategii poznaniya, pomoshh`, pro-tivodejstvie, konflikt. M.: Izdatel`stvo «Firma “E`rebus”», 2006.
  5. Podd`yakov A.N. Komplikologiya: sozdanie razvivayushhikh, diagnostiruyushhikh i de-struktivny`kh trudnostej. M.: Izd. dom Vy`sshej shkoly` e`konomiki, 2014.
  6. Popper K. Logika soczial`ny`kh nauk // E`volyuczionnaya e`pistemologiya i logika so-czial`ny`kh nauk: Karl Popper i ego kritiki. M., E`ditorial URSS, 2000. S. 298−313.
  7. Puankare A. Nauka i metod // Puankare A. O nauke. M.: Nauka, 1983. S. 283–404
  8. Radbil` T.B. Norma i anomaliya v paradigme «real`nost` – tekst» // Filologicheskie nauki. 2005. # 1. S. 53–63.
  9. Spiridonov V.F. Funkczional`naya organizacziya proczessa resheniya my`slitel`noj zadachi. Diss… dokt. psikhol. nauk. M., 2006.
  10. Forum o forume (ili o sostoyanii diskussionnogo polya nauki) // Antoropologicheskij forum. 2009. # 9. S. 9−178.
  11. Khasan B.I., Sergomanov P.A. Situacziya obucheniya kak produktivny`j konflikt // Vo-prosy` psikhologii. 2000. #2. S. 79−86.
  12. Shelestyuk E. V. Semiotika: Uchebnoe posobie. Chelyabinsk: Chelyab. gos. un-t, 2006
  13. Shukshin V.M. Voprosy` k samomu sebe // Shukshin V.M. Sobr. soch. v pyati tomakh. T. 5. Ekaterinburg: Ural`skij rabochij, 1992. S. 368−377.
  14. Yurkevich V.S. Razvivayushhij diskomfort v narodnoj i professional`noj psikho-didaktike // Odarenny`j rebenok. 2002. #2. S. 36-40.
Extract from the register of registered media dated May 23, 2019, El N FS77-75769, issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor)