BLOGGER’S LINGUAL IDENTITY IN MODERN NETWORK COMMUNICATION

M. Ryabova

BLOGGERS LINGUAL IDENTITY

IN MODERN NETWORK COMMUNICATION

The article is devoted to the issue of blogger’s lingual identity interrelated by the network communication’s sociocultural context. Based on dual oppositions method, the role of language and speech within new present day technical environment, which is reducing blogger’s subject qualities to the internet self-presentation and that is considered to be a potential possibility of recipient’s perception absolute control, is substantiated. It happens when you rely on communicative visual means and complex use of all the tools provided by the blog (nickname, avatar, etc.). Operating on the premise that within a network communication an individual has the opportunity to introduce himself in the way he wants and his speech embodied in an electronic text may be the only source of information about the blogger. The blog language is a mixture of various functional styles. It is characterized by the presence of both literary language neutral means and colloquial forms. In this sense it can be argued that blogs play the roles of evolution and development spaces for XXI century linguistic means and that this affects the blogosphere state as a whole. It was concluded that if we take into account that the development of technologies contributed to the appearance of the blog genre and the same factor still affects the genre evolution, then we can safely say that the new opportunities to study blogger’s lingual identity and to identify, how an individual use the language in his speech depending on the method of communication, with the further technological development will appear.

Keywords: language, speech, lingual identity, blogger, blogosphere, network communication environment, dual opposition, self-presentation.

References

 

  1. Bogin G.I. (1984) Model’ jazykovoj lichnosti v ee otnoshenii k raznovidnostjam tekstov [The lingual identity model in its relation to the varieties of texts]. Leningrad: Atlanta, pp. 98.
  2. Bjuler K. (1993) Teorija jazyka: reprezentativnaja funkcija jazyka: per. s nem. [Language theory: language representative function: translation from German.] / red., avt. primech., avt. predisl. T. V. Bulygina, avt. predisl. A.A. Leont’ev. Moskva: Progress, pp. 502.
  3. Vinogradov V.V. (2006) Social’no-jazykovye sistemy i individual’no-jazykovoe tvorchestvo [Socio-language systems and individual linguistic creativity] // Semiotika i Avangard: Antologija [Semiotics and Vanguard: Anthology], M., pp. 242-250.
  4. Vol’skij N.N. (2004) Lingvisticheskaja antropologija. Vvedenie v nauki o cheloveke [Linguistic anthropology. Introduction to the human sciences]. Novosibirsk: Izd. NGPU, pp. 238.
  5. Vorkachev S.G. (2001) Lingvokul’turologija, jazykovaja lichnost’, koncept: stanovlenie antropocentricheskoj paradigmy v jazykoznanii [Linguoculturology, the lingual identity, the concept: the formation of the anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics] // Filologicheskie nauki [Philological Sciences], 1. pp. 64-72.
  6. Karaulov U.N. (1987) Russkij jazyk i jazykovaja lichnost’ [Russian language and the lingual identity], Moskva: Nauka, pp. 263.
  7. Levinas E. (2000) Izbrannoe. Total’nost’ i Beskonechnoe [Selected works. Totality and Infinite], M., SPb.: Universitetskaja kniga, pp. 416.
  8. Martine A. (2004) Osnovy obshhej lingvistiki [Fundamentals of General Linguistics] / per. s fr. V. V. Shevoroshkina; pod red., vstup. st. V.A. Zvjaginceva. Moskva: Editorial URSS, pp. 224.
  9. Sepir E. Language (1993) // Sepir Je. Izbrannye trudy po jazykoznaniju i kul’turologii [Selected works on linguistics and culturology], M., pp. 223-247.
  10. Sossjur de F. (1999) Kurs obshhej lingvistiki; per. s fr. A.M. Suhotina; vstup. st. i primech. N.A. Sljusarevoj; poslesl. R. Jenglera [The course of general linguistics; translation from French by A.M. Sukhotin; introduction and note by N.A. Slusareva; afterword by R. Engler], Moskva: Logos, pp. 296.
  11. Cherkasova I.S. (2006) Realizacija kommunikativnoj strategii samoprezentacii lichnosti v russkih i nemeckih ob#javlenijah o znakomstve: avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Realization of the communicative strategy for person self-presentation in Russian and German declarations about acquaintance: the author’s abstract for the PhD dissertation]. Volgograd, pp. 25.
  12. Jakobson R. (1995) Lingvistika i pojetika [Linguistics and poetics] // Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv» [Structuralism: “for” and “against”], Moskva: Progress, pp. 190-230.
  13. Dijk T.A. van and Conversational in the of Ethnic Prejudice. Mouton Publishers, 1983. P. 375-404.
  14. Palomares N.A. Gender Schematicity, Identity Salience, Gender Linked Use. Human Communication Wiley-Blackwell, 2004. 30 (4). P. 556-588.
Extract from the register of registered media dated May 23, 2019, El N FS77-75769, issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor)